Re: [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition

[David Howells]

Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> More like "concerns".  It's unobvious to me that the modest .text
> savings justify the costs of an additional RCU implementation.  Where
> those costs include

It may be more than just modest .text savings.  Being optimised to be as
simple as possible, and to only support one CPU, it may be quicker too.  I'm
not sure how best to benchmark it though.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/