Re: [patch] security: rename ptrace_may_access =>ptrace_access_check

[Ingo Molnar]

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05/07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Subject: security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check
> > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > The ->ptrace_may_access() methods are named confusingly - the real 
> > ptrace_may_access() returns a bool, while these security checks have 
> > a retval convention.
> > 
> > Rename it to ptrace_access_check, to reduce the confusion factor.
> 
> Great. Now we can rename (and fix the callers of) ptrace.c:ptrace_may_access()
> accordingly.
> 
> But,
> 
> > -static inline int security_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *child,
> > +static inline int security_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *child,
> >  					     unsigned int mode)
> 
> You seem to forgot to update the callers of this helper.

Did i mention that it's completely untested :) Yeah, i'd suggest to 
push this naming down the whole ptrace_may_access landscape, and 
eliminate the bool. In two separate patches: first the rename, then 
the bool-elimination (which is more dangerous).

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/