Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value

[Alan Cox]

On Thu, 7 May 2009 10:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I think we need to reduce the general tick frequency to be as low as
> possible. With high resolution timers the tick frequency is just the
> frequency with which the timer interrupt disturbs a running application.
> 
> Are there any benefits remaining from frequent timer interrupts? I would
> think that 60 HZ would be sufficient.

50 works for various european video apps, 60 breaks, 60 works for various
US video apps, 50 breaks. Now that may have changed with all the select
stuff being hrtimer based (which I'd missed).

The tick also still appears to be involved in ntp and in cpu stats where
a 50Hz tick would mean only 25Hz accuracy on CPU usage etc

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/