Re: [PATCH 3/4] ring-buffer: add total count inring-buffer-benchmark
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri May 08 2009 - 00:55:19 EST
On Fri, 08 May 2009 00:32:53 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> @@ -285,6 +285,17 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
> avg = 1000000 / hit;
> pr_info("%ld ns per entry\n", avg);
> }
> +
> +
s/\n\n/\n/
> + if (missed) {
> + if (time)
> + missed /= (long)time;
> +
> + pr_info("Total iterations per millisec: %ld\n", hit + missed);
> +
> + avg = 1000000 / (hit + missed);
s/1000000/USEC_PER_SEC/?
Hopefully we can't have hit+missed==0.
They're counters and hence should have unsigned types.
But even unsigned up-counters can add to zero if wrapping occurs.
> + pr_info("%ld ns per entry\n", avg);
> + }
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/