Re: lockdep report at resume

[Johannes Berg]

On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:47 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> > > > > [ thanks for the analysis Johannes ... involving also Oliver here; really
> > > > >   seems like a false positive to me ]
> > > > I think he's right. But as a matter of principle I'd like to see 
> > > > flush_scheduled_work() avoided where possible, hence the patch.
> > > I am not entirely sure that this is the same issue as the one from #13136 
> > > of kernel.org bugzilla.
> > > Anyway, for reference, the patch Oliver mentioned here is below.
> > Thanks. Unfortunately I have another problem that turns off lockdep so I
> > can't test this right now, sorry.
> 
> Are you able to reproduce the problem with current git (the expected fix 
> is 89092ddd7a).

I don't know, unfortunately, because I keep getting a different lockdep
report at _suspend_ time.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part