Re: [RFC][PATCH] tsc_khz= boot option to avoid TSC calibrationvariance
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri May 08 2009 - 08:16:51 EST
* john stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> All,
>
> Despite recent tweaking, TSC calibration variance is still biting
> users who care about keeping close sync with NTP servers over
> reboots.
>
> Here's a recent example:
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.0/02061.html
>
> The problem is, each reboot, we have to calibrate the TSC, and any
> error, regardless of how small, in the calibrated freq has to be
> corrected for by NTP. Assuming the error is within 500ppm NTP can
> correct this, but until it finds the proper correction value for
> the new TSC freq, users may see time offsets from the NTP server.
>
> In my experience, its fairly easy to see 100khz variance from
> reboot to reboot with 2.6.30-rc.
>
> While I think its worth trying to improve the calibration further,
> there will likely be a trade-off between very accurate calibration
> and fast boot times.
>
> To mitigate this, I wanted to provide a tsc_khz= boot option. This
> would allow users to set the tsc_khz value at boot-up, assuming
> they are within 1Mhz of the calibrated value (to protect against
> bad values). Once the tsc_khz value is set in grub, the box will
> always boot with the same value, so the NTP drift value prior to
> reboot will still be correct after rebooting.
>
> Thanks to George Spelvin for the idea:
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0905.0/02807.html
>
> Thoughts or feedback?
>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
Wouldnt it be a lot more flexible to have a sysctl for this, which
would be set before ntpd is started? (or which would be set by ntpd)
The mechanism and semantics would be similar: we would _not_ expose
cpu_khz directly, we'd have a boot_cpu_khz value saved for sure, and
we'd allow the sysctl to set the cpu_khz to within 1MHz of cpu_khz -
and we'd re-scale the timer irq and other calibrated values
accordingly.
Alternatively, a much simpler method: why doesnt ntpd save its own
notion of cpu_khz once it has reached stability, and reads cpu_khz
(from /proc/cpuinfo) during bootup and re-scales its initial offset
and phase shift accordingly, compensating for that noise? (if it's
within 1MHz)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/