Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] [RFC] TuxOnIce

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday 09 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 00:46 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday 08 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 16:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Friday 08 May 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 23:51 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu 2009-05-07 19:42:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thursday 07 May 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
[--snip--]
> > > And the code includes some fundamental differences. I freeze processes
> > > and prepare the whole image before saving anything or doing an atomic
> > > copy whereas you just free memory before doing the atomic copy. You save
> > > everything in one part whereas I save the image in two parts.
> > 
> > IMO the differences are not that fundamental.  The whole problem boils down
> > to using the same data structures for memory management and I think we can
> > reach an agreement here.
> 
> I think we might be able to agree on using the same data structures, but
> I'm not so sure about algorithms - I think you're underestimating the
> differences here.

Well, which algorithms do you have in mind in particular?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/