Re: [RFC][PATCH] Multimedia scheduling class, take 2

[Jussi Laako]

Raistlin wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure I can see why, since nor a "SCHED_MM" scheduling
> policy, nor having priorities for SCHED_OTHER (different from nice
> levels) is _not_ POSIX compliant, is it?

By the way, why is SCHED_IDLE and SCHED_BATCH OK, but not SCHED_MM?

Or is it the name? How about SCHED_INTERACTIVE?


	- Jussi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/