Re: [PATCH] Kconfig: CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU move into EMBEDDEDsubmenu

[David Woodhouse]

On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 19:12 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > No.
> > As far as I know, many embedded guys use this configuration.
> > they hate unexpected latency by reclaim. !UNEVICTABLE_LRU increase
> > unexpectability largely.
> 
> As I said previous(http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/16/209), Many embedded
> environment have a small ram. It doesn't have a big impact in such
> case. 
> 
> Let CCed embedded matainers. 
> I won't have a objection if embedded maintainers ack this. 

I probably wouldn't be cheerleading for it if you wanted to make it
optional when it wasn't before -- but I suppose we might as well
preserve the option under CONFIG_EMBEDDED if the alternative is to lose
it completely.

Acked-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/