Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Saving power by cpuevacuationsched_max_capacity_pct=n

From: Balbir Singh
Date: Wed May 13 2009 - 09:46:23 EST


* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> [2009-05-13 15:14:57]:

> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 18:41 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > * Peter Zijlstra wanted more justifications for throttling at the core
> > level. Throttling may be a resource management problem rather than
> > scheduler/load balancer
>
> No, I mandate that it be thermal management. Any other reason and you've
> got a NAK.

We've been discussing hard limits from the resource management view
point. Bharata is working on a RFC that we should be able to share
soon

--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/