Re: [PATCH] Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case of no swap space
From: KOSAKI Motohiro
Date: Thu May 14 2009 - 03:20:10 EST
>
> Now shrink_active_list is called several places.
> But if we don't have a swap space, we can't reclaim anon pages.
> So, we don't need deactivating anon pages in anon lru list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
hm, The analysis seems right. but
In general branch should put into non frequency path.
why caller modification as following patch is wrong?
/*
* Do some background aging of the anon list, to give
* pages a chance to be referenced before reclaiming.
*/
- if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc))
+ if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, &sc) && (nr_swap_pages <= 0))
shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone,
&sc, priority, 0);
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 2f9d555..e4d71f4 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1238,6 +1238,12 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
> enum lru_list lru;
> struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(zone, sc);
>
> + /*
> + * we can't shrink anon list in case of no swap space.
> + */
> + if (file == 0 && nr_swap_pages <= 0)
> + return;
> +
>
> lru_add_drain();
> spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> pgmoved = sc->isolate_pages(nr_pages, &l_hold, &pgscanned, sc->order,
> --
> 1.5.4.3
>
>
> --
> Kinds Regards
> Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/