Re: [PATCH block#for-2.6.31 2/3] block: set rq->resid_len to blk_rq_bytes()on issue

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Sergei.

Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Heh... there's a reason I mentioned the original commit.  The original
>> code was
>>
>>     if (ret > 0) {
>>         /* positive number is the untransferred residual */
>>         rsp->data_len = ret;
>>         req->data_len = 0;
>>         ret = 0;
>>     } else if (ret == 0) {
>>         rsp->data_len = 0;
>>         req->data_len = 0;
>>     }
>>   
> 
>   But still,
> 
>                req->data_len = 0;
> 
> is common between both branches, so could be moved after the *if*
> statement.

Yeah, sure, feel free to submit a patch, but I don't know.  Does it
even matter at all as long as the intention is clear?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/