Re: [PATCH 3/4] vmscan: zone_reclaim use may_swap
From: Wu Fengguang
Date: Sun May 17 2009 - 23:35:43 EST
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:07:30PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] vmscan: zone_reclaim use may_swap
>
> Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt says
>
> zone_reclaim_mode:
>
> Zone_reclaim_mode allows someone to set more or less aggressive approaches to
> reclaim memory when a zone runs out of memory. If it is set to zero then no
> zone reclaim occurs. Allocations will be satisfied from other zones / nodes
> in the system.
>
> This is value ORed together of
>
> 1 = Zone reclaim on
> 2 = Zone reclaim writes dirty pages out
> 4 = Zone reclaim swaps pages
>
>
> So, "(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP) == 0" mean we don't want to reclaim
> swap-backed pages. not mapped file.
>
> Thus, may_swap is better than may_unmap.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/mm/vmscan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2387,8 +2387,8 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *z
> int priority;
> struct scan_control sc = {
> .may_writepage = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_WRITE),
> - .may_unmap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP),
> - .may_swap = 1,
> + .may_unmap = 1,
> + .may_swap = !!(zone_reclaim_mode & RECLAIM_SWAP),
> .swap_cluster_max = max_t(unsigned long, nr_pages,
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
> .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
>
Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/