Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 19 May 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> 
> Given the tradeoff is taste vs overhead, what do you think of the
> following proposal ?
> 
> trace(block_bio_complete, md->queue, bio);

I'm fine with this. It is extremely important that the trace point 
overhead is negligible when disabled. Otherwise, they serve no purpose.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/