Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed forblock/for-2.6.31 tree

[James Bottomley]

On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 00:42 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> On Wed, 20 May 2009 14:37:20 +0000 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortuantely, I still need the block tree for-next to be rebased up to
> > the current linus head because of a couple of conflicts:
> > 
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/block/hd.c
> > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/block/mg_disk.c
> 
> As discussed elsewhere, a merge of Linus' tree into the block tree will
> fix this.

Yes, I know, I was just adding urgency because scsi-misc has the two
conflicting commits in it, so it can't be merged into block for-next.

> > So they obviously moved into linus head but wasn't taken out of block
> > for-next.
> 
> Indeed.

OK, so I think your pulling of my posmerge tree can cope with the fact
that I did the necessary rebasing in block for-next before I made it the
base of my combined tree .... think of this as a nice test.

Just building now ... if it works, I'll push to SCSI post merge and all
our problems should go away.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/