Re: [PATCH 01/22] x86: add methods for writing of an MSR on severalCPUs

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:21:21AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>>
> >> smp_call_function_many() does allow concurrent execution.
> > 
> > Well, IMHO, not an absolutely concurrent execution since you can't
> > control at what moment in time the IPIs will be executed on each core,
> > IOW, the respective call function IPIs will generally not coincide on
> > each core at a given moment in time. This is especially true if you're
> > sending IPIs to cores across nodes.
> > 
> > And there's hypothetically a small window where you might get an
> > inconsistent MSR content across cores. It's a whole another question
> > whether this is going to be relevant.
> > 
> 
> It *allows* concurrent execution.  It doesn't *guarantee* concurrent
> execution.

Exactly what I'm trying to say.

> > So, the actual question is do we need that done in msr.c? If there are
> > no potential users, I could easily do the whole thing in the driver and
> > do not touch x86 code.
> 
> Only if we care about the additional performance of having it be
> nonserializing.

Well, let's do the nonserializing thing and have it done right from the
beginning. We might not care now but who knows..?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
  System  | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
 Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
  Center  | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
  (OSRC)  | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/