Re: [PATCH] ieee1394: eth1394: use "firewire%d" instead of "eth%d"as interface name

[David Miller]

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:13:50 +0200

> But I mildly disagree with the notion that the kernel can't start off
> with more qualification of the names than merely ensuring their
> uniqueness.  Or the other way around: Even an entirely meaningless
> prefix would be better than "eth..", or no prefix if that's possible,
> because eth suspiciously sounds like Ethernet with which the misnamed
> RFC 2734 driver eth1394 has very little to do.

Even the driver source file is named "ethXXX"!  All of the macros
in the driver are named ETH*.  The eth1394hdr looks eerily similar
to a real ethernet header except that it lacks a source MAC
address.  It's addressing information plus a 16-bit (wow, why that
size huh?) protocol field.  A lot like ethernet.

At the very least, it's related and similar.  So there is really
nothing inappropriate about eth* naming.

> However, how mild my disagreement is should be apparent from the fact
> that I didn't bother to suggest changing it before now, in 2009. :-)

You have more to lose by changing this now (breaking existing systems,
and yes I did see the hack workaround you posted) instead of fixing
userspace to make whatever indications you deem appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/