Re: Question on lockdep and sysrq - d

From: Ben Greear
Date: Sat May 23 2009 - 00:43:22 EST


Ming Lei wrote:
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124211522525625&w=2.
That is about some real bug in the official kernel. I am almost 100%
certain that my own code is at fault here.

I'm just trying to better understand the way lockdep prints out
all of the locks so I can easier debug my issue.

Thanks,
Ben

thanks.

2009/5/23 Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hello!

I'm trying to debug an apparent deadlock in some code I'm
writing.

When I do a sysrq 'd', I get a nice dump of locks (I have lockdep enabled).

However, the output appears to show multiple processes holding the
same locks (rtnl_mutex, for example):

Showing all locks held in the system:
3 locks held by events/11/63:
#0: (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>] run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
#1: ((linkwatch_work).work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>]
run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
#2: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
1 lock held by irqbalance/3360:
#0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
1 lock held by hald/3605:
#0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
...

Is this merely showing processes that are blocked on trying to acquire these
locks?

If so, is there any way to tell which processes have fully acquired locks
v/s
just waiting to acquire them?

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/