Re: [PATCH] [4/16] HWPOISON: Add support for poison swap entries v2

[Hidehiro Kawai]

Andi Kleen wrote:

> CPU migration uses special swap entry types to trigger special actions on page
> faults. Extend this mechanism to also support poisoned swap entries, to trigger
> poison handling on page faults. This allows followon patches to prevent 
> processes from faulting in poisoned pages again.
> 
> v2: Fix overflow in MAX_SWAPFILES (Fengguang Wu)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/swap.h    |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  include/linux/swapops.h |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/swapfile.c           |    4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/include/linux/swap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/swap.h	2009-05-27 21:13:54.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux/include/linux/swap.h	2009-05-27 21:14:21.000000000 +0200
> @@ -34,16 +34,38 @@
>   * the type/offset into the pte as 5/27 as well.
>   */
>  #define MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT	5
> -#ifndef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> -#define MAX_SWAPFILES		(1 << MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT)
> +
> +/*
> + * Use some of the swap files numbers for other purposes. This
> + * is a convenient way to hook into the VM to trigger special
> + * actions on faults.
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * NUMA node memory migration support
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
> +#define SWP_MIGRATION_NUM 2
> +#define SWP_MIGRATION_READ	(MAX_SWAPFILES + SWP_HWPOISON_NUM + 1)
> +#define SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE	(MAX_SWAPFILES + SWP_HWPOISON_NUM + 2)
>  #else
> -/* Use last two entries for page migration swap entries */
> -#define MAX_SWAPFILES		((1 << MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT)-2)
> -#define SWP_MIGRATION_READ	MAX_SWAPFILES
> -#define SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE	(MAX_SWAPFILES + 1)
> +#define SWP_MIGRATION_NUM 0
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> + * Handling of hardware poisoned pages with memory corruption.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +#define SWP_HWPOISON_NUM 1
> +#define SWP_HWPOISON		(MAX_SWAPFILES + 1)
> +#else
> +#define SWP_HWPOISON_NUM 0
> +#endif
> +
> +#define MAX_SWAPFILES \
> +	((1 << MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT) - SWP_MIGRATION_NUM - SWP_HWPOISON_NUM - 1)

I don't prefer this fix against the overflow issue.
For example, if both CONFIG_MIGRATION and CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE are
undefined, MAX_SWAPFILES is defined as 31.  But we should be able to
use up to 32 swap files/devices!

So instead, we should do:

#define SWP_MIGRATION_READ	(MAX_SWAPFILES + SWP_HWPOISON_NUM)
#define SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE	(MAX_SWAPFILES + SWP_HWPOISON_NUM + 1)

#define SWP_HWPOISON		MAX_SWAPFILES

#define MAX_SWAPFILES \
	((1 << MAX_SWAPFILES_SHIFT) - SWP_MIGRATION_NUM - SWP_HWPOISON_NUM)

and:

static inline int non_swap_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
{
	return swp_type(entry) >= MAX_SWAPFILES;
}


Regards,
-- 
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory
Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/