[PATCH] x86: memtest: remove 64-bit division

[Andreas Herrmann]

Using gcc 3.3.5 a "make allmodconfig" + "CONFIG_KVM=n"
triggers a build error:

 arch/x86/mm/built-in.o(.init.text+0x43f7): In function `__change_page_attr':
 arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:114: undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
 make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1

The culprit turned out to be a division in arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
For more info see this thread
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416232620683

The patch entirely removes the division that caused the build
error.

Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/mm/memtest.c |   14 +++++++-------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
index 605c8be..c0bedcd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
@@ -40,23 +40,23 @@ static void __init reserve_bad_mem(u64 pattern, u64 start_bad, u64 end_bad)
 
 static void __init memtest(u64 pattern, u64 start_phys, u64 size)
 {
-	u64 i, count;
-	u64 *start;
+	u64 *p;
+	void *start, *end;
 	u64 start_bad, last_bad;
 	u64 start_phys_aligned;
 	size_t incr;
 
 	incr = sizeof(pattern);
 	start_phys_aligned = ALIGN(start_phys, incr);
-	count = (size - (start_phys_aligned - start_phys))/incr;
 	start = __va(start_phys_aligned);
+	end = start + size - (start_phys_aligned - start_phys);
 	start_bad = 0;
 	last_bad = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
-		start[i] = pattern;
-	for (i = 0; i < count; i++, start++, start_phys_aligned += incr) {
-		if (*start == pattern)
+	for (p = start; p < end; p++)
+		*p = pattern;
+	for (p = start; p < end; p++, start_phys_aligned += incr) {
+		if (*p == pattern)
 			continue;
 		if (start_phys_aligned == last_bad + incr) {
 			last_bad += incr;
-- 
1.6.3.1



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/