Re: [PATCH v3] printk: add halt_delay parameter for printk delay inhalt phase

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:02:53 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The /proc thing definitely makes sense - the boot option was just 
> symmetry to the existing boot-delay approach.

ok.  btw, if we do decide to go with a general printk_delay then we'll
need a touch_nmi_watchdog() in there to keep the NMI watchdog and
softlockup detector away.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/