Re: [patch 05/38] s390: hibernation support for s390

From: Hans-Joachim Picht
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 09:34:33 EST


On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:44:51 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:


> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/s390/power/swsusp.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/s390/power/swsusp.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Support for suspend and resume on s390
> > + *
> > + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2009
> > + *
> > + * Author(s): Hans-Joachim Picht <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> > +#include <linux/gfp.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +#include <asm/ipl.h>
> > +#include <asm/processor.h>
>
> Empty functions do not need 1000 includes...

Thanks for spotting this. I will remove these.

> > +/*
> > + * save CPU registers before creating a hibernation image and
> > before
> > + * restoring the memory state from it
> > + */
> > +void save_processor_state(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * restore the contents of CPU registers
> > + */
> > +void restore_processor_state(void)
> > +{
> > +}
>
> ...and explaining why the functions can be emmpty would be nice.

I integrated the code for this in the assembly backend in the
swsusp_arch_suspend & swsusp_arch_resume functions.

With best regards,

--Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/