Re: [PATCH 4/6] x86/cpufreq: use cpumask_copy instead of =
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 12:42:34 EST
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> work_on_cpu()'s definition could probably use a fat comment describing
> why it sucks.
No, it should be renamed.
The problem is that it _sounds_ like a nice thing to do.
If it was called "slow_other_cpu_thread_switch_with_a_donkey_on_top()", I
bet people wouldn't be so damn eager to use it.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/