[patch 19/60] bnx2: Fix panic in bnx2_poll_work().
From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Jun 09 2009 - 23:38:49 EST
-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Michael Chan <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 581daf7e00c5e766f26aff80a61a860a17b0d75a upstream.
Add barrier() to bnx2_get_hw_{tx|rx}_cons() to fix this issue:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12698
This issue was reported by multiple i386 users. Without barrier(),
the compiled code looks like the following where %eax contains the
address of the tx_cons or rx_cons in the DMA status block. The
status block contents can change between the cmpb and the movzwl
instruction. The driver would crash if the value was not 0xff during
the cmpb instruction, but changed to 0xff during the movzwl
instruction.
6828: 80 38 ff cmpb $0xff,(%eax)
682b: 0f b7 10 movzwl (%eax),%edx
With the added barrier(), the compiled code now looks correct:
683d: 0f b7 10 movzwl (%eax),%edx
6840: 0f b6 c2 movzbl %dl,%eax
6843: 3d ff 00 00 00 cmp $0xff,%eax
Thanks to Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxx> for reporting the
problem and Holger Noefer <hnoefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for patiently
testing test patches for us.
[greg - took out version change]
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/bnx2.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bnx2.c
@@ -2574,6 +2574,7 @@ bnx2_get_hw_tx_cons(struct bnx2_napi *bn
/* Tell compiler that status block fields can change. */
barrier();
cons = *bnapi->hw_tx_cons_ptr;
+ barrier();
if (unlikely((cons & MAX_TX_DESC_CNT) == MAX_TX_DESC_CNT))
cons++;
return cons;
@@ -2849,6 +2850,7 @@ bnx2_get_hw_rx_cons(struct bnx2_napi *bn
/* Tell compiler that status block fields can change. */
barrier();
cons = *bnapi->hw_rx_cons_ptr;
+ barrier();
if (unlikely((cons & MAX_RX_DESC_CNT) == MAX_RX_DESC_CNT))
cons++;
return cons;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/