Re: [RFC PATCH 3/5] tracing/events: modify irq print to new format

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:45:37PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> -#define softirq_name(sirq) { sirq##_SOFTIRQ, #sirq }
> -#define show_softirq_name(val)			\
> -	__print_symbolic(val,			\
> -			 softirq_name(HI),	\
> -			 softirq_name(TIMER),	\
> -			 softirq_name(NET_TX),	\
> -			 softirq_name(NET_RX),	\
> -			 softirq_name(BLOCK),	\
> -			 softirq_name(TASKLET),	\
> -			 softirq_name(SCHED),	\
> -			 softirq_name(HRTIMER),	\
> -			 softirq_name(RCU))
> +#define softirq_name(sirq) sirq##_SOFTIRQ, #sirq
> +#define show_softirq_name(val)						\
> +	"%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s>",	\
> +		softirq_name(HI),					\
> +		softirq_name(TIMER),					\
> +		softirq_name(NET_TX),					\
> +		softirq_name(NET_RX),					\
> +		softirq_name(BLOCK),					\
> +		softirq_name(TASKLET),					\
> +		softirq_name(SCHED),					\
> +		softirq_name(HRTIMER),					\
> +		softirq_name(RCU)

This is a massive readability and maintainabilit  regression over the
old code.  I now need to add a useless and counter-intuitive %d=%s,
boilerplate for every new flag I add instead ofa simple line-line
array entry.

Also why does show_softirq_name get a val argument passed that's never
used?  And no, I don't think
%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s,%d=%s is an intuitive
way to print an enum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/