Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter/x86: Fix the model number of IntelCore2 processors

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Wed Jun 10 2009 - 07:06:00 EST



* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Yong Wang wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> > index 40978aa..a49a82c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> > @@ -1407,7 +1407,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_init(void)
> > * Install the hw-cache-events table:
> > */
> > switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> > - case 17:
> > + case 15:
> > + case 23:
> > memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, core2_hw_cache_event_ids,
> > sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
>
> There are actually four model numbers that refer to the same
> core microarchitecture:
>
> model 15: original 65 nm celeron/pentium/core2/xeon, "Merom"/"Conroe"
> model 22: single-core 65 nm celeron/core2solo "Merom-L"/"Conroe-L"
> model 23: current 45 nm celeron/core2/xeon "Penryn"/"Wolfdale"
> model 29: six-core 45 nm xeon "Dunnington"
>
> You should probably list all of them here.

Yeah - i've amended the commit with your suggestions - thanks Arnd!

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/