Re: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2

[Martin Schwidefsky]

On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:52:51 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> 
> > Greetings,
> > version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt()
> > fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with
> > the issue.
> > Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to
> > the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2
> > with another tick_nohz_disable().
> 
> Any update on this one ?

I haven't heard anything from any Andy in regard to patch #1. We could
do patch #2 now and decide later what we want to do with the old style
profiler.

blue skies,
  Martin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/