Re: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Wed Jun 10 2009 - 14:39:50 EST


On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 13:04, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> While implementing ftracer and ftracer graph support, I found the exact
>> arch implementation details to be a bit lacking (and my x86 foo ain't
>> great). ÂSo after pounding out support for the Blackfin arch, document
>> the requirements.
>
> This does not belong in the Kconfig. That's the last place a developer
> will look for implementing something.

yes and no -- i was following the existing documenting practice of
ftrace where details were added to the Kconfig. guess i should fix
that in the process.

there should be at least tips in each HAVE_XXX as to where to look for
implementation details.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/