Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > What kind of conflicts are there against -tip? The diffstat 
> > > suggests it's mostly in-SLAB code, right? There shouldnt be 
> > > much to conflict, except kmemcheck - which has more or less 
> > > trivial callbacks there.
> > 
> > The conflicting bits are the patches that remove bootmem 
> > allocator uses in arch/x86 and kernel/sched.c.
> 
> Give me an hour and i'll get some minimal testing done.

This tree doesnt conflict (not even with kmecheck) - and the older 
bits you sent against the scheduler and against x86 doesnt apply 
anymore - but they do look scary.

How about this: i can send the scheduler and x86 bits to Linus right 
now, that should make it possible to have a clean base for you and 
no interactions with anything pending?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/