Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: perf_counter AMD supports performancemonitoring for K7

[Ingo Molnar]

* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> index 240ca56..5d56742 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> @@ -1436,6 +1436,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  
>  static int amd_pmu_init(void)
>  {
> +	/* performance-monitoring supported from K7 */
> +	if (boot_cpu_data.x86 < 7)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	x86_pmu = amd_pmu;
>  
>  	switch (boot_cpu_data.x86) {

A commit under Linux consists of three parts:

  1) the title
  2) the changlog
  3) the body

This sloppy patch of yours manages to get _all_ three wrong:

  - the title is wrong (it is incorrect)
  - the changelog is wrong (it is missing)
  - the body is wrong (it is broken - K7 != family 7)

What the heck is going on here?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/