On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 11:35 +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:Hi Jaswinder,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:Hello Stephen,I am happy to take the m68k change and push that upstream.
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 00:19 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:Hi Jaswinder,Maintainers are also in CC.
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:00:30 +0530 Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The following changes since commit e271e1343a94e081723cb4180af3fdb5fecc1a49:Is there some reason that these fixes are not just sent to the appropriate linux-am33-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Ingo Molnar (1):
Merge branch 'x86/mce4'
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-top.git master
Jaswinder Singh Rajput (3):
headers_check fix: m68k, swab.h
headers_check fix: mn10300, ptrace.h
headers_check fix: mn10300, setup.h
arch/m68k/include/asm/swab.h | 2 +-
arch/mn10300/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 ++---
arch/mn10300/include/asm/setup.h | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
maintainers? That way we would avoid unnecessary conflicts cropping up.
Patches were already sent on :
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] headers_check fix patches 20090604
Interested maintainers already pulled and applied patches. These are
left-over patches. I am sending to Ingo hoping that he will merge it
otherwise last option for me will be to prepare headers-check tree and
send to linux-next ;-)
If it hasn't already been picked up by someone else.
Sure, take it.
So now only mn10300 patches left :-)
Thanks,
--
JSR