Re: [PATCH 2/2] SLUB: Disable debugging if it increases theminimum page order

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Christoph,

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 09:43 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > We have had that with SLAB. NO! This leads to the situation that some
> > > slabs have debug on and some have not. You just do not know which.
> >
> > I do see your point but surely we don't want to use order 1 allocations
> > in the fall-back case for kmalloc-4096? Couldn't we just add a printk
> > saying that debug was disabled for the cache? After all, my patch is
> > much better than what SLAB does.

On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:24 -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> If we are enabling global debugging then we are looking for memory
> corruption in *all* slab caches. Disabling debugging of some cache behind
> the scenes is bad even if this leads to order 1 allocations.
> 
> We could refine the way to specify groups of slab caches that should have
> debugging on.

I think my patch is the simplest solution here: it turns off debugging
for those caches where the metadata bumps up the minimum allocation
order and I suspect that we disable cache only for 4096 in practice.

Also note that when we switch back to more aggressive page allocator
pass-through, we lose SLUB debugging support.

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/