Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI PM: Read device power state from register afterupdating it
From: Jesse Barnes
Date: Thu Jun 11 2009 - 14:55:49 EST
On Tue, 26 May 2009 21:52:29 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Monday 18 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > After attempting to change the power state of a PCI device
> > pci_raw_set_power_state() doesn't check if the value it wrote into
> > the device's PCI_PM_CTRL register has been stored in there. Still,
> > it modifies the device's current_state field as though that's the
> > case. This may cause the driver of the device to think that its
> > power state has been changed while in fact it hasn't.
> >
> > To prevent such situations from happening modify
> > pci_raw_set_power_state() so that it reads the device's PCI_PM_CTRL
> > register after writing into it and uses the value read from the
> > register to update the device's current_state field. Also make it
> > return -EIO if the new state of the device is not equal to the state
> > requested by the called.
> >
> > To distinguish this error condition from the other ones make
> > pci_raw_set_power_state() return -ENOSYS instead of -EIO when it is
> > impossible to change the power state of the device, because it
> > doesn't support the native PCI PM at all or the requested target
> > state is not supported by it.
>
> Having reconsidered it I think that -ENODEV is probably better than
> -ENOSYS for this purpose. Updated patch follows.
Applied to linux-next, thanks Rafael.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/