Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix malloc() stall in zone_reclaim() and bringbehaviour more in line with expectations V3

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:50 +0100
Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The big change with this release is that the patch reintroducing
> zone_reclaim_interval has been dropped as Ram reports the malloc() stalls
> have been resolved. If this bug occurs again, the counter will be there to
> help us identify the situation.

What is the exact relationship between this work and the somewhat
mangled "[PATCH for mmotm 0/5] introduce swap-backed-file-mapped count
and fix
vmscan-change-the-number-of-the-unmapped-files-in-zone-reclaim.patch"
series?

That five-patch series had me thinking that it was time to drop 

vmscan-change-the-number-of-the-unmapped-files-in-zone-reclaim.patch
vmscan-drop-pf_swapwrite-from-zone_reclaim.patch
vmscan-zone_reclaim-use-may_swap.patch

(they can be removed cleanly, but I haven't tried compiling the result)

but your series is based on those.

We have 142 MM patches queued, and we need to merge next week.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/