Re: [this_cpu_xx 01/11] Introduce this_cpu_ptr() and generic this_cpu_*operations

[Tejun Heo]

Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
>> Looks good to me.  The only qualm I have is that I wish these macros
>> take pointer instead of the symbol name directly.  Currently it's not
> 
> They take the adress of the scalar. No symbol name is involved.
> 
>> possible due to the per_cpu__ appending thing but those should go with
>> Rusty's patches and the same ops should be useable for both static and
>> dynamic ones.  One problem which may occur with such scheme is when
> 
> They are usable for both as the following patches show.

Oops, sorry about that.  Got confused there.  :-)

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/