Re: [PATCH][Fix] New Unified AVR32/AT91 MCI Driver that supportsboth MCI slots used at the same time

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Well, what is the best way to differentiate it from the at91_mci
> > driver and keep users from trying to use both drivers?  
> 
> I propose that we setup a kind of choice sub menu in the Kconfig for
> those two drivers when they are both supported.

Shouldn't it be enough to simply add

	depends on !THE_OTHER_DRIVER

to both of them?

Btw, what are the long-term plans for this? Should the at91_mci driver
be phased out once the atmel-mci driver supports all at91 and avr32
devices?

> > Who would that be as I haven't seen anyone who maintains any of those
> > boards other than the at91rm8200 (at least nothing listed in the
> > MAINTAINERS file)?  The board-sam9g20ek.c platform only shows Atmel as
> > the most recent copyright.  
> 
> Hey, AT91 are very well maintained, SAM9 as well as at91rm9200.
> So, AT91 specific bits should be sent to this mailing-list with Andrew
> Victor in copy.
> I will also certainly add comments on this code.

One of you should update MAINTAINERS to reflect this.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/