Re: [RFC PATCH] posix-cpu-timers: optimize callingthread_group_cputime()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Jun 12 2009 - 07:09:59 EST


On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 12:39 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> - times->utime = cputime_add(times->utime, t->utime);
> - times->stime = cputime_add(times->stime, t->stime);
> - times->sum_exec_runtime += t->se.sum_exec_runtime;
> + if (mask & TG_CPUCLOCK_UTIME)
> + times->utime = cputime_add(times->utime, t->utime);
> + if (mask & TG_CPUCLOCK_STIME)
> + times->stime = cputime_add(times->stime, t->stime);
> + if (mask & TG_CPUCLOCK_SCHED)
> + times->sum_exec_runtime += t->se.sum_exec_runtime;

Does adding 3 branches really make it faster? Since you're bound to want
at least one, I would expect the cacheline to be hot (assuming all three
variables live in the same cacheline -- if not, they should be!), so all
you're avoiding is the addition.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/