Re: [PATCH 19/19] PM: Add empty suspend/resume device irq functions

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2009-06-12 13:32:18, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 01:13:17PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu 2009-06-11 22:42:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > git commit 0a0c5168 "PM: Introduce functions for suspending and resuming
> > > device interrupts" introduced some helper functions. However these
> > > functions are only available for architectures which support
> > > GENERIC_HARDIRQS.
> > 
> > I believe architectures that do not use GENERIC_HARDIRQs should just
> > provide the empty functions themselves.
> > 
> > If we want to help them, perhaps few attribute((weak)) functions in
> > the core are the way to go...
> 
> We can still do that when there actually is an architecture that doesn't
> support GENERIC_HARDIRQs _and_ needs non-empty functions.

Ok, I guess that makes sense.

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/