Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline

[Ingo Molnar]

* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > 
> > Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree;
> 
> No.
> 
> This seems to be 99% merges o fother branches.
> 
> I'm no longer pulling from people who can't keep their branches 
> clean and develop without pulling from me every other day, or 
> pulling from other random branches. If it gets that many 
> conflicts, I just don't want to see it - there's something 
> seriously wrong with it.
> 
> And if you just merge for some random reason, I don't want to pull 
> it either.
> 
> So in either case, I'm not pulling this.
> 
> Just _look_ at that gitk thing. It has several stretches of just 
> "Merge branch 'linus' into kmemcheck". WITH NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT 
> IN BETWEEN!

This is an ancient one year old tree :-/

Vegard, i suspect you are best off by creating a clean, rebased 
(same-content) series linear tree out of the patches - with all 
fixes backmerged and there being a good logical order of patches.

Since it will be same-content it should be doable in short order. I 
can do it too if you dont have the time.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/