Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clean up vdso-layout.lds.S

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:40:32PM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> The handling of various sections in the VDSO linker script
> looks pretty haphazard. This patch series cleans it up in
> these regards:
> 
>  - improve the coding style
>  - remove superfluous sections
>  - issue a linker error if a section is encountered which
>    is known not to work
>  - check that the .got section is empty, except for the
>    three entries defined by the ABI
>  - discard sections which are not useful to user-space
> 
> Petr Tesarik (8):
>   x86: Adjust the coding style of vdso-layout.lds.S
>   x86: Remove .sdata from the vDSO linker script
>   x86: add .broken section to the vDSO linker script
>   x86: mark altinstr-related sections in vDSO as broken
>   x86: mark some standard sections as broken in a vDSO
>   x86: check the size of GOT in vDSO
>   x86: remove unneeded section from the vDSO
The above looks good.
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

> 
>   x86: Remove .dynbss from the vDSO linker script
This one I am a little reluctant about as I do not understand
why ld sometimes adds and sometimes does not add this section.
At least judging from the arch specific linker scripts some archs
include it and others do not.

I grepped the binutils source and bfd/elf64-x86-64.c mentions
dynbss several times.
Maybe just adding it to broken would suffice as we would
then be informed it it is used by some ld versions?

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/