Re: [PATCH] scripts/checksyscalls.sh: only whine perf_counter_open when supported

[Paul Mundt]

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 06:48:52AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > If the port does not support HAVE_PERF_COUNTERS, then they can't support
> > the perf_counter_open syscall either. ??Rather than forcing everyone to add
> > an ignore (or suffer the warning until they get around to implementing
> > support), only whine about the syscall when applicable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Andrew: could you pick this up since Ingo acked it now ?

I fail to see why this is necessary? cond_syscall() takes care of this in
the not implemented case, the same as every other syscall backing some
feature that has yet to be implemented.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/