Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: Fix call-chain supportto use NMI-safe methods

[Linus Torvalds]

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> __copy_from_user_inatomic() isn't NMI safe in that it can trigger
> the page fault handler which is another trap and its return path
> invokes IRET which will also close the NMI context.

That's not the only problem.

An even more fundamental problem is that the page fault handler is not 
re-entrant because of simple the value in %cr2. So regardless of any 
'iret' issues, you *CANNOT* take a page fault in an NMI, because the NMI 
might happen while we're in the critical region of having taken another 
page fault, but before we've saved off the value of %cr2 in that old page 
fault.

If the NMI handler causes a page fault, it will corrupt the %cr2 of the 
outer page fault. That's why the page fault is done with an interrupt 
gate, and why we have that conditional local_irq_enable() in it.

So page faults are fundamentally only safe wrt normal interrupts, not NMI.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/