Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: Fix call-chain supportto use NMI-safe methods
From: Avi Kivity
Date: Mon Jun 15 2009 - 15:22:33 EST
On 06/15/2009 10:10 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
But one thing is sure: it is certainly going to be faster than the
INVLPG(s!) we have to do with the GUP solution.
Sure, but we only pay that price when we do the callchain bit, not on
every NMI.
You can read cr2 on nmi entry and nmi exit, and only write it if it has
changed (if it turns out that writing cr2 is expensive; ISTR that it isn't).
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/