Re: [tip:perfcounters/core] perf_counter: x86: Fix call-chainsupport to use NMI-safe methods

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* H. Peter Anvin (hpa@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > 
> > As the maintainer of the out-of-tree LTTng tracer, which hooks in the
> > page fault handler with tracepoints, and which can build almost entirely
> > as modules, I am very tempted to argue that having the nmi-code entirely
> > robust wrt in-kernel page faults would be a very-nice-to-have feature.
> > 
> 
> I doubt that is ever going to be reliable, due to reentrancy issues.
> 
> 	-hpa

Do you mean the page fault handler code is no ever going to be reliable
or the tracer code ?

I spent a great deal of effort making LTTng lockless and reentrant wrt
NMIs. It would be great if the low-level kernel exception handlers would
do the same, therefore I would not have to isolate the tracer from the
kernel as I currently do. Well, I would still continue to isolate the
tracer from the kernel, but at least I would not have to spend as much
effort controlling what exceptions and faults paths the tracer is
executing.

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/