Re: [PATCH 5/6] Unified AVR32/AT91 MCI Driver Support for a VCC Pin
From: Rob Emanuele
Date: Mon Jun 15 2009 - 18:17:27 EST
That would be fine with me.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Michael Roth<mroth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
>> index 1c1a4b3..a639b93 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/atmel-mci.c
>> @@ -214,6 +214,8 @@ struct atmel_mci_slot {
>>
>> int detect_pin;
>> int wp_pin;
>> + int vcc_pin;
>> + bool vcc_pin_act_low;
>
> Maybe, just 'vcc_active_low' is more clear?
>
> Most other kernel code use 'active_low' or 'xyz_active_low' as far as I can
> see.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/