Re: Scheduler fails to allow for "niceness" with new/fast processes
From: Alan Cox
Date: Tue Jun 16 2009 - 10:49:38 EST
There are lots of patterns of activity where the bottleneck will be I/O
rather than CPU, and nice is basically about CPU priority. Package
building does tend to do a lot of disk writing so its not entirely
unexpected
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/