[PATCH 10/16] x86/ioapic.c: move lost comment to what seems like appropriate place

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Tue Jun 16 2009 - 16:19:41 EST


From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>

The comment got separated from its subject, so move it to what
appears to be the right place, and update to describe the current
structure.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 12 +++++-------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index ce5e888..089a4e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -116,13 +116,6 @@ static int __init parse_noapic(char *str)
}
early_param("noapic", parse_noapic);

-/*
- * This is performance-critical, we want to do it O(1)
- *
- * the indexing order of this array favors 1:1 mappings
- * between pins and IRQs.
- */
-
struct irq_pin_list {
int apic, pin;
struct irq_pin_list *next;
@@ -137,6 +130,11 @@ static struct irq_pin_list *get_one_free_irq_2_pin(int node)
return pin;
}

+/*
+ * This is performance-critical, we want to do it O(1)
+ *
+ * Most irqs are mapped 1:1 with pins.
+ */
struct irq_cfg {
struct irq_pin_list *irq_2_pin;
cpumask_var_t domain;
--
1.6.2.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/