Re: 2.6.30: hibernation/swsusp lockup due to acpi-cpufreq

[Johannes Stezenbach]

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:09:23PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> Right, so it's the suspend-must-disable-local-interrupts thing.  Again.
>  create_image()'s local_irq_disable().
> 
> It was wrong to call work_on_cpu() with lcoal interrupts disabled, and
> it's now wrong to call smp_call_function_single() with local interrupts
> disabled.  It's just that smp_call_function_single() warns while
> work_on_cpu() didn't.
> 
> That all explains the warning But afaik we still don't know why your
> machine actually failed.  Perhaps it is a side-efect of emitting the
> warning when the console is in a weird state?

smp_call_function_single() enables irqs and hibernate doesn't like that?

BTW, I have no other UP machine to test with, but I reported
in another thread that a !SMP kernel (or a SMP kernel
with maxcpus=0 parameter) does not boot at all on
my destop machine, see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/12/468

No idea if I should be worried about this since the
SMP kernel now works fine, another hibernate problem
was solved in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/14/156


Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/