Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC

[Eric W. Biederman]

Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Ah, OK.  The pirq is set up for a specific domain rather than being
> global (otherwise it would need some kind of "which domain can access
> which pirq" table).  dom0 can either create a pirq for itself or someone
> else, and the final user of the pirq binds it to a domain-local evtchn.
>
> I think.  I really haven't looked into the pci-passthrough parts very
> closely yet.

I certainly could not find the code that would let you setup a pirq for another
domain.  In fact the pirq code aka alloc_vectors appears to hard code dom0
in Xen 3.4.

pci-passthrough since it is domU, and since you describe it as well isolated and
comparatively simple should be a shoe in.

Further as you describe it pci-passthrough is a subset of what we have to do for dom0.
So if we can I would like to see the pci passthrough code get merged first.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/