[PATCH 0/5] tracing: seqfile fixes

From: Li Zefan
Date: Fri Jun 19 2009 - 02:41:39 EST

While testing syscall tracepoints proposed by Jason, I found some
entries were missing when reading available_events.

It turned out there's bug in seqfile handling. The bug is, it's
wrong to increment @pos in seq start().

I fixed similar bugs in some other places. (the last patch fixes
a different seqfile bug)

[PATCH 1/5] tracing/events: don't increment @pos in s_start()
[PATCH 2/5] tracing_bprintk: don't increment @pos in t_start()
[PATCH 3/5] trace_stat: don't increment @pos in stat_seq_start()
[PATCH 4/5] ftrace: don't increment @pos in g_start()
[PATCH 5/5] tracing: reset iterator in t_start()
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
kernel/trace/trace.c | 18 ++++--------------
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/trace/trace_printk.c | 26 ++++++--------------------
kernel/trace/trace_stat.c | 6 +-----
5 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/